That’s right, it’s a multi-parter.
Aren’t I just the worst?
Right, this FOI has given me plenty to talk about and this response was well recieved and, thankfully, detailed.
And first of all, to put it simply, I’m just going to throw you the stats.
Now, take these at face value, because in this week’s twisty turny edition of… ben… you’ll find out that recycling statistics are really not all they seem.
|
2000/01 |
7.43% |
2005/06 |
17.03% |
|
2001/02 |
8.37% |
2006/07 |
18.39% |
|
2002/03 |
10.74% |
2007/08 |
26.61% |
|
2003/04 |
12.93% |
2008/09 |
30.59% |
|
2004/05 |
14.95% |
2009/10 |
32.00% (Provisional) |
Sorry about the two-tiered layout. I know, it sucks, and I’ll fix it soon, but, for now, goggle at it’s wonderment.
Quadrupled rate in 10 years is always good, there are no complaints here.
Part 2 is here!
Posted by That Birmingham City Council FOI Part 2; Recycling figures and indeterminate terms… « Recycling and Birmingham. Hand in shaky hand. on May 7, 2010 at 3:09 pm
[...] All about me. Don’t hold your breath… ^^. « Birmingham City Council and Recycling Part 1; The stats… [...]